I have two things: a history lesson, and a serious question.
1.)
The Donner Party Tragedy was a terrible event that took place in 1846-1847. Trapped in the Sierra-Nevada mountains, half-starved, the Donner Party was the most well-known tragedy of the western migration. The website linked above has a detailed account of the journey, and it's actually quite fascinating.
Suspected foul play, dates that don't match to events, varying accounts of things (like a stabbing), et cetera.
At any rate, The Donner Party got so desperate for food that some of them, after eating everything possible, including shoes, clothes, et cetera, eventually ate those in the party who died. Which brings me to my question:
2.) Could you eat human flesh?
I know it sounds terrible, but reading through the diaries, seeing the mention of cannibalism (and the hesitation, in part, of other people in mentioning it in their memoirs) got me thinking. They were so hungry, having not eaten for days, having already killed all their animals... What else could they do to live?
But at the same time, they must have known how others would react to hearing of such a thing. It would be shameful to recount in the future, and it would probably bring shame to your own family. It would have been considered scandalous, and possibly even a sin.
Personally, I don't know if I could do it. I guess, though, to people living in 1847/1847, the killing and skinning of animals (doing it, seeing it) was perfectly normal. Today, it's not normal. So to them, it might not have been so difficult to skin and dry the meat of their fallen party. It's not as if they killed them, themselves; the people who were eaten died of starvation, going insane, etc.
But you know, you'd be scarred for life, with the knowledge that you ate someone, and you knew them, their family, their face, their name.
Imagine how terrible it must have been for those people-- for anyone, really, but especially for these people, who traveled months together, side-by-side-- to have to have resorted to eating those that died. I can't imagine what it would be like to be forced into that situation, to have no other choice. I think that I would rather die, but these men had families-- wives, children-- depending on them to bring help. And really, it's not as if you can feel pain once you're dead, you know? It's such a debatable thing.
Note that later wagon trains of emigrants remembered and feared something similar happening to them. This resulted in a lot of people left on the side of the trail. Cholera victims are most worth mentioning. Since they usually died fairly quickly anyway (within 24 hours), many were left to die. (Sometimes a "watcher" was selected to stay behind, dig a grave, and catch up to the train when the victim died, but oftentimes the watcher was in such a hurry they dug the grave before the victim died. Imagine watching your own grave be dug. Quite a few were buried alive.) If the wagon train halted too many times, too often, they could be caught in the snow like The Donner Party.
It was, no doubt, on the mind of every emigrant as they reached that particular general area. (Now called Donner Lake, it was formerly Truckee Lake, named after an Indian who guided a train through the mountains, there.)